
Crit went terrific with meaningful feedback by Prof. Nirmal, Kelvin & Lim. Idea of mutual symbiosis through skills of slum people and its use for city was acceptable by jury. Few innovative ideas shared by tutors as below:
By Prof. Joseph Lim
*Use existing low frequency train for mobility of infrastructure, train is not necessarily to be drive by fund of people only.
*Set a target model like Dabbawallas (person with lunch box) from Mumbai e.g. they deliver every lunch box on time and they recognized for their punctuality. Similarly idea of Papad making and other local food art can follow such system within rail corridor by use of existing train.
*Socio-economic development.
*Analyze potential of unambiguous areas on site and then make a decision on programme.
*Take benefit of existing low frequency train.
Prof. Nirmal Kishnani
*Issues of safety, security and barrier free environment especially children, because last year one student did railway land development and in the end she designed playground for children without safety measure consideration.
*One student won competition of future arc competition, problem was to build within 1000km of radius and student took project near railway line and proposed use of
transportation for construction. Use similar strategy of existing transportation for development.
*Make people think for second level of livelihood e.g. In delhi one Tea maker using solar panel to charge mobile phones and opening more opportunity for earnings.
*Study highland corridor of New York for lucid analysis of site potential.
*Use parametric architecture only if needed otherwise avoid in this particular project.
Prof. Kelvin Kan
*Idea of mutual symbiosis is strong enough to derive Design Programme.
By Prof. Joseph Lim
*Use existing low frequency train for mobility of infrastructure, train is not necessarily to be drive by fund of people only.
*Set a target model like Dabbawallas (person with lunch box) from Mumbai e.g. they deliver every lunch box on time and they recognized for their punctuality. Similarly idea of Papad making and other local food art can follow such system within rail corridor by use of existing train.
*Socio-economic development.
*Analyze potential of unambiguous areas on site and then make a decision on programme.
*Take benefit of existing low frequency train.
Prof. Nirmal Kishnani
*Issues of safety, security and barrier free environment especially children, because last year one student did railway land development and in the end she designed playground for children without safety measure consideration.
*One student won competition of future arc competition, problem was to build within 1000km of radius and student took project near railway line and proposed use of
transportation for construction. Use similar strategy of existing transportation for development.
*Make people think for second level of livelihood e.g. In delhi one Tea maker using solar panel to charge mobile phones and opening more opportunity for earnings.
*Study highland corridor of New York for lucid analysis of site potential.
*Use parametric architecture only if needed otherwise avoid in this particular project.
Prof. Kelvin Kan
*Idea of mutual symbiosis is strong enough to derive Design Programme.